AI-Driven Telemetry Analytics for Predictive Reliability and Privacy in Enterprise-Scale Cloud Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9262.IJAIDSML-V6I2P114Keywords:
Telemetry Analytics, AI-Driven Monitoring, Predictive Reliability, Distributed Systems, Privacy Preservation, Observability, Anomaly Detection, Multi-Cloud, Enterprise SystemsAbstract
The exponential growth of distributed and cloud-native systems has amplified the complexity of telemetry data collection, processing, and analysis across enterprise environments. While existing observability tools such as Prometheus, AWS CloudWatch, and Datadog provide valuable insights, they rely heavily on static thresholds and manual tuning limiting scalability and responsiveness in dynamic workloads. This paper proposes an AI-driven telemetry analytics framework that unifies predictive reliability and privacy-preserving observability for large-scale enterprise systems. The framework employs machine learning–based anomaly detection and cross-layer correlation of metrics, traces, and logs to predict service degradation before it impacts critical business operations. A privacy-preserving data pipeline ensures compliance with enterprise governance policies and emerging data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA). Experimental evaluation within hybrid and multi-cloud environments demonstrates notable improvements in reliability metrics, including a 35% reduction in mean time to detect (MTTD), a 40% decrease in false positives, and a 30% reduction in monitoring overhead compared to traditional static monitoring systems. The findings emphasize the feasibility of AI-enhanced observability pipelines in enabling proactive fault management, operational resilience, and regulatory compliance in distributed enterprise architectures. This work contributes to bridging the gap between academic observability research and real-world industry adoption
References
[1] C. Hellerstein, A. Fox, and J. Wilkes, “Telemetry for distributed systems: Challenges and directions,” IEEE Computer, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 24–34, 2020.
[2] M. Peuster and H. Karl, “Modeling and monitoring of distributed cloud applications,” IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2021.
[3] AWS, CloudWatch Technical Whitepaper, Seattle, WA, 2023.
[4] D. Munoz, L. Kowalski, and M. van Steen, “Privacy-preserving monitoring of distributed systems,” ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1–23, 2022.
[5] S. Rajan, P. Patel, and K. Liu, “Machine learning in observability: A systematic literature review,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 125 678–125 697, 2023.
[6] N. Mehta, A. Banerjee, and R. Kumar, “Adaptive observability through AI-driven telemetry pipelines,” IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 34–45, 2024.
[7] Y. Li and S. Sarkar, “Privacy-aware AI monitoring in cloud-native systems,” ACM Queue, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 58–69, 2023.
[8] OpenTelemetry Project, “Standardizing telemetry data collection,” Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), 2024.
[9] T. Hoff, The Observability Handbook, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, 2023.
[10] M. Banu, L. Hernandez, and K. Wu, “Benchmarking monitoring systems for distributed workloads,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 45 431–45 445, 2024.
[11] Datadog Research, “Operational challenges in multi-cloud observability,” 2022.
[12] D. Suri, P. Kumar, and V. Ramaswamy, “Predictive reliability in telemetry-driven architectures,” IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1124–1137, 2023.
[13] M. Papazoglou and S. Dustdar, “Service reliability in distributed computing,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 74–83, 2022.
[14] Gartner, AIOps and Observability Market Trends, Stamford, CT, 2023.
[15] A. Singhal, J. Li, and F. Martinez, “Federated anomaly detection for cloud observability,” IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2024.
[16] NIST, Framework for Zero-Trust Telemetry in Distributed Environments, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington DC, 2025
