What’s the True ROI of Copay Programs? A Transparent Framework for Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9262.IJAIDSML-V6I4P110Keywords:
Copay assistance, ROI, gross-to-net (GTN), incrementality, difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, accumulator/maximizeAbstract
The copay assistance benefit programs lower out of pocket (OOP) patient expenses, and may enhance therapy initiation and compliance, but their actual ROI is commonly lost in confounding policy processes and accounting methods. The present paper gives a clear audit-compliant structure of ROI as a risk-adjusted incremental contribution margin assigned to copay exposure excluding gross-to-net factors (rebates, chargebacks, fees), operating costs, and compliance risk. The framework breaks down impact into four causal levers initiation, adherence/persistence, channel steering and price elasticity and relates them to what can be observed (incremental new starts, days on therapy, refill cadence, payer mix). It will be identified using quasi-experimental designs (difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, instrumental variables, and synthetic controls) and survival analysis to ascribe adherence benefits to lifetime value. An explicit guideline on policies such as accumulator/maximizer program, step edits and specialty carve-outs is to keep benefits overstated. Governance guardrails are pre-registered analysis plans, data lineage, and sensitive panels are included, making results comparable across brands and time. Applied scenarios reveal that copay programs are value-generating under high elasticity and abandonment risk and high accumulator exposure and low cannibalization and high policy frictions, but value-destroying under dominance of cannibalization and high policy frictions, respectively. What it delivers is an effective toolkit that standardizes ROI equations, decision dashboards, and scenario testing that will allow financial stewardship to meet patient access and allow credible reporting to manufacturers, payers, providers and researchers
References
[1] Choi, D., Zuckerman, A. D., Gerzenshtein, S., Katsivalis, K. V., Nichols, P. J., Saknini, M. C., ... & Dusetzina, S. B. (2024). A primer on copay accumulators, copay maximizers, and alternative funding programs. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 30(8), 883-896.
[2] Cavalier, D., Doherty, B., Geonnotti, G., Patel, A., Peters, W., Zona, S., & Shea, L. (2023). Patient perceptions of copay card utilization and policies. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, 11(1), 2254586.
[3] Turner, H. C., Hori, Y., Revill, P., Rattanavipapong, W., Arai, K., Nonvignon, J., ... & Teerawattananon, Y. (2023). Analyses of the return on investment of public health interventions: a scoping review and recommendations for future studies. BMJ Global health, 8(8).
[4] Top 10 U.S. Market Access Trends for 2024, iqvia, Online. https://www.iqvia.com/locations/united-states/blogs/2024/02/top-10-us-market-access-trends-for-2024
[5] Thusini, S. T., Milenova, M., Nahabedian, N., Grey, B., Soukup, T., Chua, K. C., & Henderson, C. (2022). The development of the concept of return-on-investment from large-scale quality improvement programmes in healthcare: an integrative systematic literature review. BMC health services research, 22(1), 1492.
[6] Fusco, N., Sils, B., Graff, J. S., Kistler, K., & Ruiz, K. (2023). Cost-sharing and adherence, clinical outcomes, health care utilization, and costs: a systematic literature review. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 29(1), 4-16.
[7] Measuring ROI in Healthcare, roiinstitute, Online. https://roiinstitute.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Measuring-ROI-in-Healthcare_chapter-one.pdf
[8] L, Hailemeskel B, Hollander R, Bush A, Misra R, et al. (2021) The Challenges Surrounding the Collections of Copayment. Int J Nurs Health Care Res 04: 1203. DOI: 10.29011/2688-9501.101203
[9] The ultimate guide to ROI in healthcare, cured.health, Online. https://www.cured.health/resources/the-ultimate-guide-to-roi-in-healthcare
[10] Solid, C. A. (2020). Return on investment for healthcare quality improvement. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[11] Hanna, E., Tavella, F., Rémuzat, C., Auquier, P., & Toumi, M. (2015). Market access of atmps: overview and expected challenges. Value in Health, 18(7), A518-A519.
[12] Koçkaya, G., & Wertheimer, A. (2016). Pharmaceutical market access in emerging markets. SEEd.
[13] Buzachero, V., Phillips, J., Phillips, P., & Phillips, Z. (2013). Measuring ROI in healthcare. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
[14] Optimizing market access How therapeutic area dynamics could influence strategy, deloitte, 2019. Online. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/life-sciences/pharmaceutical-pricing-market-access.html
[15] Botchkarev, A., Andru, P., & Chiong, R. (2011). A return on investment as a metric for evaluating information systems: taxonomy and application. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 6(6), 245-269.
[16] KFF explainer (policy mechanics & prevalence). https://www.kff.org/health-costs/copay-adjustment-programs-what-are-they-and-what-do-they-mean-for-consumers/
[17] KFF Employer Health Benefits Survey 2024 (context & plan design). https://www.kff.org/health-costs/2024-employer-health-benefits-survey/
[18] NCSL state policy tracker (accumulator legislation landscape). https://www.ncsl.org/health/copayment-adjustment-programs
[19] AJMC study (adherence impact under accumulators). https://www.ajmc.com/view/impact-of-a-copay-accumulator-adjustment-program-on-specialty-drug-adherence
[20] JMCP 2024 (Patel et al.) CAAP bans, OOP and adherence effects. https://www.jmcp.org/doi/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.9.909
[21] JMCP primer Accumulators, maximizers, AFPs (open access). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11293768/
[22] HHS-OIG Advisory Opinions (compliance guardrails for assistance programs). https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/advisory-opinions/
[23] Islam, M. A., Jahin, M. A., Mridha, M. F., & Dey, N. (2024). A unified framework for evaluating the effectiveness and enhancing the transparency of explainable AI methods in real-world applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03884.
[24] Wuepper, D., & Huber, R. (2022). Comparing effectiveness and return on investment of action‐and results‐based agri‐environmental payments in S witzerland. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 104(5), 1585-1604.
[25] Berger, E. J. (2002). Friction modeling for dynamic system simulation. Appl. Mech. Rev., 55(6), 535-577.
[26] Blackwell, M. (2013). A framework for dynamic causal inference in political science. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 504-520.
[27] Kalouptsidi, M., Kitamura, Y., Lima, L., & Souza-Rodrigues, E. A. (2020). Partial identification and inference for dynamic models and counterfactuals (No. w26761). National Bureau of Economic Research.










