Governing Enterprise AI at Scale: from Model Risk Management to System Level Intelligence Assurance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9262.IJAIDSML-V7I1P136Keywords:
AI Governance, Intelligence Assurance, Model Risk Management, Multi Agent Systems, Decision Lineage, Explainability, Confidence Governance, Validation Loops, Shared Memory, Policy Tagging, Telemetry, Integrated Quality Engineering, Auditability, Resilience, System ArchitectureAbstract
As enterprises transition from single model deployments to complex multi agent AI ecosystems, governance practices that focus narrowly on individual models (e.g., documentation, validation, and monitoring of model risk) prove insufficient. Failures now emerge from system level dynamics context loss across agents, inconsistent reasoning, untraceable decision lineage, and confidence drift under fragmented data estates. This paper advances a system level intelligence assurance framework that elevates governance from policy and process to architecture and telemetry. We outline a reference approach that combines shared memory, validation loops, confidence governance, policy tagging, and auditable evidence chains with operational KPIs such as reasoning consistency, lineage completeness, and redundant compute rate. Implementation patterns, adoption playbooks, and cross industry use cases demonstrate how enterprises can move beyond model risk management to govern the entire AI system ensuring decisions are explainable, compliant, resilient, and continuously improving. The proposed approach complements Quality Engineering by making trust executable and measurable in production.
References
[1] Gartner. Model Risk Management in the Age of Generative AI. Gartner Special Report, 2024.
[2] McKinsey & Company. Governing AI at Scale: From Ethics to Execution. McKinsey Global Institute, 2024.
[3] World Economic Forum. AI Governance Alliance: Prescriptive Guidance for Responsible AI. WEF, 2023.
[4] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Principles for Sound Management of Model Risk. Bank for International Settlements, 2023.
[5] OECD. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Big Data in Risk Management. OECD Publishing, 2023.
[6] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). U.S. Department of Commerce, 2023.
[7] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Towards a Standard for Identifying and Managing Bias in Artificial Intelligence. NIST Interagency Report, 2022.
[8] IEEE Standards Association. IEEE 7001 2023: Transparency of Autonomous Systems. IEEE, 2023.
[9] IEEE Standards Association. IEEE 7000 2021: Model Process for Addressing Ethical Concerns During System Design. IEEE, 2021.
[10] European Commission. EU Artificial Intelligence Act: Proposal and Impact Assessment. European Union, 2024.
[11] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 31000: Risk Management – Guidelines. ISO, Geneva.
[12] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems. ISO, Geneva.
[13] Doshi Velez, F., & Kim, B. Towards a Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning. arXiv:1702.08608.
[14] Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. “Why Should I Trust You?” Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. ACM KDD, 2016.
[15] DARPA. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Program Overview. U.S. Department of Defense.
[16] Molnar, C. Interpretable Machine Learning. 2nd Edition, 2022.
[17] Google SRE. Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems. O’Reilly Media.
[18] Charity Majors et al. Observability Engineering. O’Reilly Media, 2022.
[19] Microsoft. Engineering Reliable AI Systems at Scale. Microsoft Engineering Blog Series, 2024.
[20] Netflix Technology Blog. Operationalizing Governance and Resilience Through Telemetry. Netflix, 2023.










