LLM-Based Auto-Remediation Model for DevOps Pipeline Failures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9262.IJAIDSML-V3I3P117Keywords:
DevOps, CI/CD, Auto-Remediation, Large Language Models, AI-Ops, Pipeline Failure Detection, Root Cause Analysis, Automation, Observability, Intelligent TroubleshootingAbstract
DevOps pipelines are the backbone of modern software delivery. They make it very easy to quickly, automatically, and continuously integrate and deploy across many other different cloud environments. However, these pipelines often fail because of configuration drifts, dependency mismatches, infrastructure inconsistencies as well as code-level errors. This causes operational bottlenecks that slow down releases along with their require a lot of human intervention. Standard remediation techniques rely heavily on these pre-written scripts, rigid rule-based frameworks, or engineers doing manual diagnostics. These methods often don't work well with the changing nature of toolchains and multi-cloud architectures. Recent progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) could make these pipelines more reliable by using context-aware reasoning, advanced root-cause analysis, and automated solution formulation. This work presents an LLM-based auto-remediation methodology designed to detect pipeline failures, analyze logs, correlate error patterns, provide corrective actions, and when feasible autonomously rectify issues in actual time. The proposed paradigm integrates natural language understanding with DevOps telemetry, source code analysis & configuration verification to connect detection as well as resolution. Experimental evaluations of widely used these CI/CD systems demonstrate substantial improvements in mean time to recovery (MTTR), a reduction in repetitive manual debugging tasks, and enhanced their pipeline dependability, especially in complex cloud-native workflows. The LLM-driven system is better than typical remediation scripts because it can adapt to the latest types of failures without needing to be reprogrammed, provide better information about the context of mistakes, and works well across teams & environments. This study shows how LLMs can change DevOps operations from being reactive to proactive, cut down on interruptions & let engineers focus on coming up with the latest ideas instead of putting out fires. This is a huge step toward self-healing automation in modern software delivery ecosystems.
References
[1] Tamanampudi, Venkata Mohit. "AI and DevOps: Enhancing Pipeline Automation with Deep Learning Models for Predictive Resource Scaling and Fault Tolerance." Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research 7 (2021): 38-77.
[2] Paule, Christina. "Securing DevOps: detection of vulnerabilities in CD pipelines." (2018): 77-78.
[3] Enemosah, Aliyu. "Implementing DevOps Pipelines to Accelerate Software Deployment in Oil and Gas Operational Technology Environments." International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research 8.12 (2019): 501-515.
[4] Tanikonda, Ajay, et al. "Integrating AI-Driven Insights into DevOps Practices." Journal of Science & Technology 2.1 (2021).
[5] Düllmann, Thomas F., Christina Paule, and André van Hoorn. "Exploiting devops practices for dependable and secure continuous delivery pipelines." Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering. 2018.
[6] Tyagi, Anuj. "Intelligent DevOps: Harnessing artificial intelligence to revolutionize CI/CD pipelines and optimize software delivery lifecycles." Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research 8 (2021): 367-385.
[7] Thompson, Bennett. "DevOps Pipeline Optimization for Faster Software Delivery." International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 6.5 (2019).
[8] Suk, Tonghoon, et al. "Failure-aware application placement modeling and optimization in high turnover DevOps environment." 2019 IEEE 12th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD). IEEE, 2019.
[9] Tatineni, Sumanth, and Anirudh Mustyala. "AI-Powered Automation in DevOps for Intelligent Release Management: Techniques for Reducing Deployment Failures and Improving Software Quality." Advances in Deep Learning Techniques 1.1 (2021): 74-110.
[10] Sethupathy, Anugula, and Utham Kumar. "Self-healing systems and telemetry-driven automation in DevOps pipelines." International Journal of Novel Research and Development 3 (2018): 148-155.
[11] Dhaliwal, Neha. "Validating software upgrades with ai: ensuring devops, data integrity and accuracy using ci/cd pipelines." Journal of Basic Science and Engineering 17.1 (2020).
[12] Zeller, Marc. "Towards continuous safety assessment in context of devops." International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.
[13] Luz, Welder Pinheiro, Gustavo Pinto, and Rodrigo Bonifácio. "Adopting DevOps in the real world: A theory, a model, and a case study." Journal of Systems and Software 157 (2019): 110384.
[14] Toh, M. Zulfahmi, Shamsul Sahibuddin, and Mohd Naz'ri Mahrin. "Adoption issues in DevOps from the perspective of continuous delivery pipeline." Proceedings of the 2019 8th international conference on software and computer applications. 2019.
[15] Alluri, Venkat Rama Raju, et al. "DevOps Project Management: Aligning Development and Operations Teams." Journal of Science & Technology 1.1 (2020): 464-487.










