Blockchain-Anchored Audit Trails for Neuro-Symbolic Urban AI: Immutable Accountability for Autonomous Decisions in Smart City Infrastructure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9262.IJAIDSML-V6I4P134Keywords:
Blockchain, Smart City, Neuro-Symbolic AI, Audit Trail, Algorithmic Accountability, Smart Contracts, AI Governance, EU AI Act, GDPR, Autonomous Decision-MakingAbstract
Autonomous AI systems making real-time decisions over traffic management, energy dispatch, and emergency services in smart city infrastructure exert direct and consequential influence over citizen welfare, yet current smart city AI architectures provide no tamper-proof record of what the system decided, which rules or neural pathways drove the decision, and whether the decision record has been modified after the fact. This paper proposes a blockchain-anchored audit trail architecture for neuro-symbolic urban AI, comprising seven interoperable smart contracts deployed on a permissioned blockchain that capture every autonomous decision produced by a neuro-symbolic smart city AI as a structured, hash-chained, publicly auditable on-chain event. The neuro-symbolic AI architecture, which combines symbolic safety rule enforcement with neural perception to produce interpretable multi-domain urban decisions, generates structured decision records encoding the symbolic rules invoked, the neural confidence scores, the sensor input state, and the action taken records that are substantive enough for blockchain commitment to support genuine accountability rather than opaque hash logging. The seven smart contracts implement decision submission, symbolic rule version hashing, neural-symbolic conflict detection, governance voting for rule amendments, citizen decision trace queries, counterfactual incident replay, and cryptographically signed regulatory audit export. The architecture satisfies the EU AI Act Article 19 mandatory logging requirements for high-risk AI systems, the GDPR Article 22 right to explanation for automated decisions, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework governance function, while providing a citizen challenge mechanism and a tamper-proof governance record that centralized smart city AI architectures cannot offer by design.
References
[1] R. Kitchin, "The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism," GeoJournal, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2014.
[2] A. Luque-Ayala and S. Marvin, "Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism," Urban Studies, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 2105-2116, 2015.
[3] B. Lepri, N. Oliver, E. Letouze, A. Pentland, and P. Vinck, "Fair, transparent, and accountable algorithmic decision-making processes," Philosophy and Technology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 611-627, 2018.
[4] S. Gupta and K. Vanteru, "Neuro-Symbolic AI for Autonomous Urban Decision-Making: A Framework for Resilient Smart Cities," in Proc. 2025 Int. Conf. on Computing Technologies (ICOCT), 2025, pp. 1-6. IEEE.
[5] H. Garcez and L. C. Lamb, "Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd wave," arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.05876, 2020.
[6] X. Yue, H. Wang, J. Jin, M. Li, and W. Jiang, "Healthcare data gateways: Found healthcare intelligence on blockchain with novel privacy risk control," Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 40, no. 10, p. 218, 2016.
[7] F. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Ji, and Z. Han, "Secure and decentralized federated learning framework with non-IID data based on blockchain," Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 5, p. e27176, Feb. 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27176.
[8] A. Erbad, "Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Adoption for Smart City Governance," in J. Prieto et al. (Eds.), Blockchain and Applications, 6th International Congress, BLOCKCHAIN 2024, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 1256, Springer, 2025.
[9] H. D. Jovita-Olvez et al., "Synergizing AI and blockchain: a bibliometric analysis of their potential for transforming e-governance in smart cities," Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, vol. 7, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2025.1553816
[10] European Parliament. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1689, 2024.
[11] E. Androulaki, A. Barger, V. Bortnikov, C. Cachin, K. Christidis, A. De Caro, D. Enyeart, C. Ferris, G. Laventman, Y. Manevich, S. Muralidharan, C. Murthy, B. Nguyen, M. Sethi, G. Singh, K. Smith, A. Sorniotti, C. Stathakopoulou, M. Vukolic, S. W. Cocco, and J. Yellick, "Hyperledger Fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains," in Proc. EuroSys, 2018, pp. 1-15.
[12] V. Buterin, "Notes on blockchain governance," vitalik.ca, Dec. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://vitalik.ca/general/2017/12/17/voting.html
[13] European Parliament. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L 119, 2016.
[14] E. Ben-Sasson, A. Chiesa, C. Garman, M. Green, I. Miers, E. Tromer, and M. Virza, "Zerocash: Decentralized anonymous payments from Bitcoin," in Proc. IEEE S&P, 2014, pp. 459-474.
[15] National Institute of Standards and Technology. Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST AI 100-1. U.S. Department of Commerce, Jan. 2023.
[16] P. Tsankov, A. Dan, D. Drachsler-Cohen, A. Gervais, F. Buenzli, and M. Vechev, "Securify: Practical security analysis of smart contracts," in Proc. ACM SIGSAC CCS, 2018, pp. 67-82.
[17] A. Zanella, N. Bui, A. Castellani, L. Vangelista, and M. Zorzi, "Internet of Things for smart cities," IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 22-32, Feb. 2014.
[18] G. Wood, "Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger," Ethereum Project Yellow Paper, 2014.
[19] S. Gupta, AI, Blockchain, and Autonomous Innovation: Charting the Future of Intelligent Enterprises. Amazon, 2025.
[20] N. Testi and R. Marconi, "Exploring the potential of blockchain technology for citizen engagement in smart governance," Open Research Europe, vol. 3, p. 183, 2025. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16153.4
