Converging Infrastructure and Security: A Maturity-Based Approach to Cloud-Native Data Protection, SIEM Optimization, and Compliance Automation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9262.IJAIDSML-V5I1P129Keywords:
Cloud Security Architecture, Cybersecurity Maturity Model, Cloud-Native Security, SIEM Optimization, Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), Data Protection, Backup and Recovery, Multi-Cloud Security, Zero Trust SecurityAbstract
Modern enterprises increasingly struggle to manage cloud security architecture, infrastructure resilience, SIEM operations, and regulatory compliance as isolated disciplines, resulting in operational inefficiencies, increased cyber risk, and costly audit processes. This paper presents a comprehensive five-level maturity model that unifies these traditionally disconnected domains into a cohesive framework for enterprise cybersecurity transformation. The proposed maturity model comprising Fragmented, Instrumented, Correlated, Automated, and Adaptive stages provides organizations with a practical roadmap for assessing current capabilities and systematically advancing toward intelligent, self-optimizing security operations. Unlike conventional reference architectures that assume green field deployments, the framework addresses the realities of heterogeneous enterprise environments spanning multi-cloud platforms, storage infrastructures, backup systems, security information and event management (SIEM) solutions, and compliance programs. The study further introduces diagnostic decision flows, capability maps, maturity transition guidance, and comparative operational metrics demonstrating improvements in incident detection, containment, backup resilience, compliance coverage, and automation maturity. By emphasizing the convergence of cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity operations, data protection, and governance through automation and cross-functional collaboration, the proposed framework enables organizations to reduce operational complexity, strengthen cyber resilience, accelerate regulatory compliance, and establish adaptive security capabilities suitable for modern cloud-native enterprises.
References
[1] National Institute of Standards and Technology: Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, Version 1.1. NIST (2018)
[2] Center for Internet Security: CIS Controls Version 7. CIS (2018)
[3] International Organization for Standardization: ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Information Security Management Systems - Requirements. ISO (2013, reaffirmed 2019)
[4] American Institute of CPAs: SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria. AICPA (2017)
[5] Kim, G., Humble, J., Debois, P., Willis, J.: The DevOps Handbook. IT Revolution Press (2016)
[6] Forsgren, N., Humble, J., Kim, G.: Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps. IT Revolution Press (2018)
[7] Hubbard, D.W., Seiersen, R.: How to Measure Anything in Cybersecurity Risk. Wiley (2016)
[8] Scarfone, K., Mell, P.: Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems. NIST Special Publication 800-94 (2017 revision)
[9] Souppaya, M., Scarfone, K.: Guide to Enterprise Patch Management Technologies. NIST Special Publication 800-40 Rev. 3 (2018)
[10] Stine, K., Quinn, S., Witte, G., Gardner, R.K.: Integrating Cybersecurity and Enterprise Risk Management. NIST Internal Report 8286 (2020)
[11] Cloud Security Alliance: Security Guidance for Critical Areas of Focus in Cloud Computing, v4.0. CSA (2017)
[12] Ross, R., et al.: Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations. NIST Special Publication 800-53 Rev. 5 (2020)
[13] ENISA: Cloud Security Guide for SMEs. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (2019)
[14] Hutchins, E.M., Cloppert, M.J., Amin, R.M.: Intelligence-driven computer network defense informed by analysis of adversary campaigns. Lockheed Martin Corporation (2017 update)
[15] Verizon: Data Breach Investigations Report. Verizon Business (2020)










