Data-Driven Sea Level Forecasting for Cambridge, Maryland: Leveraging Time Series Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9262.IJAIDSML-V6I3P114Keywords:
Mean Sea Level, Time Series Forecasting, Neural Network Autoregression, Ocean City, MarylandAbstract
The accelerating rise in sea levels poses a significant challenge for coastal communities, necessitating accurate forecasting methods. This study evaluates the efficacy of various time series models in predicting long-term sea level changes, including ARIMA, ETS, NNETAR, THETAM, TBATS, STLM, and their hybrid combinations. Using monthly mean sea level data from Cambridge, Maryland, spanning January 1971 to February 2025, a comparative analysis was conducted. The NNAR(27,1,14)[12] model emerged as the most accurate, performing exceptionally well across all metrics, especially with very low RMSE and MAE values among all tested models. These findings underscore the potential of neural network-based approaches in sea level forecasting and highlight the importance of integrated modeling techniques as decision-support tools for local mean sea level predictions. Understanding historical sea level trends is crucial for improving future projections, and this study contributes to that knowledge base. Continued research efforts leveraging these data-driven insights can significantly enhance our ability to refine predictions and develop effective strategies to mitigate the impacts of sea level rise
References
[1] NOAA. (2025, May 12). Annual 2019 Global Climate Report. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report /global/201913
[2] IPCC, (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp. Retrieved from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
[3] U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP), (2017). Climate science special report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I. [Wuebbles, D.J., D.W. Fahey, K.A. Hibbard, D.J. Dokken, B.C. Stewart, and T.K. Maycock (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 470 pp. Retrieved from: https://science2017.globalchange.gov/
[4] Church, J. A., & White, N. J. (2011). Sea-level rise from the late 19th to the early 21st Century. Surveys in Geophysics, 32, 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-011-9119-1
[5] Church, J. A., White, N. J., Aarup, T., Wilson, W. S., Woodworth, P. L., Domingues, C. M., Hunter, J. R., &d Lambeck, K. (2008). Understanding global sea levels: past, present and future. Sustainability Science, 3, 9-22. doi: 10.1007/s11625-008-0042-4
[6] Cazenave, A., & Llovel, W. (2010). Contemporary sea level rise. Annual Review of Marine Science, 2, 145-173. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081105.
[7] Horton, B. P., Kopp, R. E., Garner, A. J., Hay, C. C., Khan, N. S., Roy, K., & Shaw, T. A. (2018). Mapping sea-level change in time, space, and probability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 481-521. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025826
[8] Kulp, S. A., & Strauss, B. H. (2019). New elevation data triple estimates of global vulnerability to sea-level rise and coastal flooding. Nature Communications, 10:4844, 1-12. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12808-z
[9] Foster, G., & Brown, P. T. (2014). Time and tide: analysis of sea level time series. Climate Dynamics, 45(1-2), 291-308. doi:10.1007/s00382-014-2224-3
[10] Visser, H., Dangendorf, S., & Petersen, A. C. (2015). A review of trend models applied to sea level data with reference to the “acceleration-deceleration debate”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 120(6), 3873-3895. doi:10.1002/2015JC010716
[11] Bruneau, N., Polton, J., Williams, J., & Holt, J. (2020). Estimation of global coastal sea level extremes using neural networks. Environmental Research Letters, 15, 074030, 12 pages. DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab89d6
[12] Bruno Vicente Primo de Siqueira, & Afonso de Moraes Paiva. (2021). Using neural network to improve sea level prediction along the southeastern Brazilian coast. Ocean Modelling, 168, 101898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2021.101898.
[13] Alenezi, N., Alsulaili, A., & Alkhalidi, M. (2023). Prediction of Sea Level in the Arabian Gulf Using Artificial Neural Networks. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(11), 2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112052
[14] Nicholls, R. J., & Cazenave, A. (2010). Sea-Level Rise and Its Impact on Coastal Zones. Science, 328(5985), 1517-1520. DOI: 10.1126/science.1185782
[15] Kopp, R. E., Horton, R. M., Little, C. M., Mitrovica, J. X., Oppenheimer, M., Rasmussen, D. J., Strauss, B. H., & Tebaldi, C. (2014). Probabilistic 21st and 22ndcentury sea-level projections at a global network of tide-gauge sites. Earth’s Future, 2, 383–406. doi:10.1002/2014EF000239
[16] Dangendorf, S., Calafat, F. M., Arns, A., Wahl, T., Haigh, I. D., & Jensen, J. (2014), Mean sea level variability in the North Sea: Processes and implications, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119, 6820–684. doi:10.1002/2014JC009901
[17] Jevrejeva, S., Jackson, L. P., Rive, R. E. M., Grinsted, A., & Moore, J. C. (2016). Coastal sea level rise with warming above 2 °C. PNAS, 113(47), 13342-13347. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605312113
[18] Cambridge, Maryland. (2025, May 8). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge,_Maryland
[19] Kiddle. (2025, May 12). Cambridge, Maryland facts for kids. Kids Encyclopedia Facts. https://kids.kiddle.co/ Cambridge,_Maryland
[20] NOAA. (2025, May 12). Frequently Asked Questions. NOAA Tides & Currents. https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/est/ faq.shtml
[21] Perone, G. (2022). Comparison of ARIMA, ETS, NNAR, TBATS and hybrid models to forecast the second wave of COVID-19 hospitalizations in Italy. The European Journal of Health Economics, 23, 917–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01347-4
[22] Zhang, G. Peter, Patuwo, B. Eddy, and Hu, Michael Y. (1998). Forecasting with artificial neural networks: The state of the art. International Journal of Forecasting, 14(1), 35-62.
[23] Tealab, A. (2018). Time series forecasting using artificial neural networks methodologies: A systematic review, Future Computing and Informatics Journal, 3(2), 334-340.
[24] Daniyal, M., Tawiah, K., Muhammadullah, S., & Opoku-Ameyaw, K. (2022). Comparison of conventional modeling techniques with the neural network autoregressive model (NNAR): Application to COVID-19 data. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022, Article ID 4802743, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4802743
[25] Almarashi, A. M., Daniyal, M., & Jamal, F. (2024). A novel comparative study of NNAR approach with linear stochastic time series models in predicting tennis player’s performance. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 16:28, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00815-7
[26] Hightower, A., Ziedan, A., Guo, J., Zhu, X., & Brakewood, C. (2024). A comparison of time series methods for post-COVID transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 26:100097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2024.100097
[27] Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2021). Forecasting: principles and practice (3rd Ed.). OTexts, Melbourne. Available at: https://otexts.com/fpp3
[28] Dagum, E. B., & Bianconcini, S. (2016). Seasonal Adjustment: Meaning, Purpose, and Methods. In Seasonal Adjustment Methods and Real Time Trend-Cycle Estimation (pp. 61–78). Springer.
[29] Zhang, G. Peter. (2003). Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing, 50, 159-175.